Talk:Ian Anstruther
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Name of this article
See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
- Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
I am moving this page.--Vintagekits 19:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- On that basis, it should probably be at Ian Anstruther. I'll move it there.
- In future, please would you fix double redirects when you move an article - currently, Ian Anstruther redirects to Sir Ian Fife Campbell Anstruther, 8th Baronet, which redirects to Ian Fife Campbell Anstruther. -- !! ?? 20:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Who's Who entry
ANSTRUTHER of that Ilk, Sir Ian Fife Campbell 8th Bt cr 1694 (S), of Balcaskie, and 13th Bt cr 1700 (S), of Anstruther, and 10th Bt cr 1798 (GB), of Anstruther; Hereditary Carver;
b 11 May 1922; s of Douglas Tollemache Anstruther, g s of 5th Bt, and Enid, d of Lord George Granville Campbell; S cousin, 2002; m 1st, 1951, Honor Blake (marr. diss. 1963); one d; 2nd, 1963, Susan Margaret Walker, e d of H. St J. B. Paten; two s three d. Educ: Eton; New Coll., Oxford. Work: FSA 1975. Landowner and author. Publications: I Presume, 1956; The Knight and the Umbrella, 1963; The Scandal of the Andover Workhouse, 1973; Oscar Browning, 1983; Coventry Patmore's Angel, 1992; The Angel in the House, Books I and II, 1998; (with Patricia Aske) Dean Farrar and ‘Eric', 2003. - Kittybrewster (talk) 11:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- Do any "reliable sources" indicate that he held only two baronetcies, not three? The cited sources (and the above) indicate the latter. -- !! ?? 10:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Rayment. - Kittybrewster (talk) 10:47, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- It may be worth adding a note that he claimed (and was widely reported as holding) three, but Rayment says two, and that is likely to be consistent with what is understood to be the terms of the original grant. -- !! ?? 20:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think User:Choess is checking this with the SCB. - Kittybrewster (talk) 21:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- It may be worth adding a note that he claimed (and was widely reported as holding) three, but Rayment says two, and that is likely to be consistent with what is understood to be the terms of the original grant. -- !! ?? 20:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
-