Talk:I Want Candy (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Article upgrading needed: You can help! WP:IA   Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development. To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met: Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.) Film infobox ({{infobox film}}) Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.) Plot summary Include cast and crew information. At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.) Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))  Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (nations and regions): Canadian cinema task force

Please add more information about the cast and the crew, discussing the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, and giving insights into the casting and staffing where possible. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines for more advice.

I made this movie. Every fact here is true. This is a low budget British movie from Ealing Studios which Buena Vista (ie Disney) have picked up and are treating like a major movie. I lean towards karma rather than dogma, but it seems a touch absurd that the only amendment that anyone can make is to append 'according to the press release' in relation to parts of the plot. I cannot post the Empire review because it hasn't come out yet. The trailer was premiered on Sun Online and garnered 100,000, a record for The Sun by a significant margin. Last night, we had a screening where 450 laughed so long and hard tghat they kept missing jokes. i just want to fit in. What do I do?Mynameispiers 21:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

What you should do is clear off and spam a newsgroup instead. This is an encyclopedia, not a marketing channel. SpaceyHopper 21:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Spacey man. I give in. you feel stronger than i. wikipedia guidelines rule, tho i have an increasingly uneasy feeling about the self appointed guardians of what is fair comment. you censors youtube, for instance? you at least have the good grace to show yourself, or at least your avatar. i am just a guy who's prepared to wear a chicken suit to promote his movie (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z196p-bpaoo).

You misunderstand; Wikipedia isn't a platform for comment, 'fair' or otherwise.SpaceyHopper 15:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 Merge from Candy Fiveways 2 Plagiarism 3 Vandalism 4 Fair use rationale for Image:I want candy.jpg

[edit] Merge from Candy Fiveways

Please merge any relevant content from Candy Fiveways per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Fiveways. Thanks. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-11 05:10Z

[edit] Plagiarism

The content of this article has large portions which are exactly the same as on the official website. Would anyone like to reassure me this some how isn't plagiarised?--213.78.207.45 22:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

for some reason somebody placed random letters somewhere, i dont know if it is vandalism, but it would be nice if people didnt add this random stuff. Evildoctorbluetooth 13:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:I want candy.jpg

Image:I want candy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)