Talk:I Saw Her Standing There

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Start
This article has
been rated as
Start-Class on the
assessment scale.
  This Beatles-related article is within the scope of The Beatles WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of The Beatles, Apple Records, George Martin, Brian Epstein/NEMS, and related topics. You are more than welcome to join the project and/or contribute to discussion.

This article
has not been
rated on the
importance scale.
Suggested article edit guidelines:
If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Assessment Department for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Assessment.
This article is also within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia.
A Song Infobox has been requested for this article. Please format it according to the guidelines.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
The Beatles To-do: You can HELP!:

[edit] Tiffany

If we're gonna have this much stuff on the Tiffany cover single, including the other two tracks on the single, then I suggest, we spin it off into a separate article, titled I Saw Him Standing There. --Rob 12:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Agreed.--Patthedog 13:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Done --Rob 14:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] References & sources

John, Shall I assume that if my UK edition of Miles / Lewisohn etc appears to support the US version then it’s ok to merge and just use whichever template is already in place? The ISBN will obviously differ though. Yes, Q is possibly a bit feeble being only a magazine, as you say, (it is "The Band Of The Century" edition BTW) but the contributions from fairly notable journalists make it worthwhile, I think. The same applies therefore, to MOJO. If they appear online then that makes a difference?--Patthedog 14:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: US vs. UK edition. I think you have to assume that there may be differences, and only merge if you have verified the citations using whichever edition you have, and change to that edition. In many cases, page numbers will differ. For "Recording Sessions", they may be exactly the same, but you can't assume that. If there's any doubt, leave citations that point to whichever edition was supplied by the original editor.
Re: Q magazine. I don't think the source is weak; I think the citation to it is weak. (see comments below about source quality and print vs. online) If you have the source, use a citation in this basic form:
{{cite journal
  |last=<article-author-surname>
  |first=<article-author-givenname>
  |title=<article-title>
  |journal=Q Magazine Collectors' Limited Edition
  |volume=<edition-volume-#>
  |pages=<page-number(s)>
  |date=<edition-date>
  |publisher=[[EMAP]]}}

Replace the stuff in < - > with the indicated data.

Re: online vs. offline. I don't think appearing online vs. in print denotes anything about the quality of a source. If I write down some drivel, then pay someone to print it, the information is still drivel. The same rule holds if I write some drivel and then put it on a web page. The author and publisher are the important factors.
Online stuff is easier to access if the publisher keeps the page online and doesn't change the URL. Printed stuff may be harder to access, but the publisher can't change it or delete it after its published. If an article is printed and available online, that's the best of both worlds: it's accessible online (at least now) and a printed copy will be available via good reference libraries, etc. In that case, cite both: {{cite journal}} supports a url= parameter.
On further thought, maybe that should be
{{cite journal
  |last=<article-author-surname>
  |first=<article-author-givenname>
  |title=<article-title>
  |journal=Q Magazine Collectors' Limited Edition
  |volume=<edition-volume-#>
  |pages=<page-number(s)>
  |date=<edition-date>
  |publisher=[[EMAP]]}}
or
{{cite journal
  |last=<article-author-surname>
  |first=<article-author-givenname>
  |title=<article-title>
  |journal=Q
  |volume=Collectors' Limited Edition
  |pages=<page-number(s)>
  |date=<edition-date>
  |publisher=[[EMAP]]}}

John Cardinal 16:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:03 iwantoholdyourhand.jpg

Image:03 iwantoholdyourhand.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)