Talk:I Not Stupid Too

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I Not Stupid Too is part of SGpedians' Resources
An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore.
To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is also under the scope of WikiProject Singaporean Arts and Entertainment.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B
This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the priority scale.
This article is within the scope of the Comedy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to comedy, comics, comedians, comedy movies, and the like. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Maintained The following user(s) are actively involved with this article and may be able to help with questions about verification and sources:
Hildanknight (talk · contribs)
This in no way implies article ownership; all editors are encouraged to contribute.
Peer review I Not Stupid Too has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
  • This film is completely different form the first one. But the direction of these two episodes are the same, both want to bring out every child has their own excellence for their parents to be proud of. Parents should look more at their child's good ways, not just only scold about all the things they did. If they had tried their best, parents should be appreciate about it.

And the small actors acted very well in this film. They could express out how teenagers feel in this present society, facing the stress in schools, family, or maybe sometimes from money. This is a really good film! And Shawn is very handsome!=]

--Lamlamb 14:04, 25 June 2006 (UTC)lam=]

[edit] Defunct reference-link

There is a defunct link to a reference: http://su.ntu.edu.sg/tribune/article.php?id=240, so I can't format it properly unless someone can provide the information. --Vsion 01:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out, Vsion. For some reason, BlueCoat WebFilter (which is installed on my school computers) blocks the Internet Archive as an "anonymizing utility". If you don't find any information on the Internet Archive, the reference should be removed, after which we will have to find another reference for the Cast section. As references on Singaporean topics are so hard to find, I guess we are forced to rely on IMDB's information again. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 03:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Defunct link, revived.
You can thank me later. Pandacomics 03:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyedit

This article, or a prior version of it, was copyedited by the League of Copyeditors on 03:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC). The League is always in need of editors with a good grasp of English to review articles. Visit the Project page if you are interested in helping.

  • Reviewed the article 2/5/2008. Made comments regarding improvement of this article in its talk page. --Charleenmerced Talk 14:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Copyedited by Lilipatina (talk) – 05:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Proofread by Liquidfire1 (talk) – 03:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:INotStupidToo.jpg

Image:INotStupidToo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)