User talk:I'm On Base

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent I'm On Base (talk • contribs • block logauto  confirmed socks) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.


Archive
Archives
Archive 1


I'mOnBase's Current talk page
Wikipedia Ads file info – show another – #105


Contents

Speedy deletion of Main pics

A tag has been placed on Main pics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Non-dropframe (talk) 00:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Main pics

A tag has been placed on Main pics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Non-dropframe (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove warning templates from your talk page. Thanks, --Non-dropframe (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Pictures

Actually, the place for pictures is here [1]: that's its entire purpose. Acroterion (talk) 00:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

NDF Response

I'm afraid not. The messages are permanent though you can archive them (which I see you have already done with some past messages). The reason for this is so that other editors visiting your page can determine your skill level as an editor or for levels of warnings you've been given in the past. While I'm certain you are a well-meaning editor even the most experienced still keep their messages form long ago. Thanks, --Non-dropframe (talk) 00:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Contributions

Hello. I've noticed that your contributions lately haven't been as focused on building encyclopedic content as much as they have been to produce user space and "game" content. Please do realize that this is an encyclopedia for building a reference of knowledge. While editors such as yourself have a place in social communities, your focus on that aspect of the project is not beneficial to building an encyclopedia. Instead of making userboxes about subjects you are interested in, write about them in articles. And instead of building secret pages, photograph things or people that Wikipedia does not have images for.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Altering another person's edits

Your recent edit to Talk:The Lightning Thief was inappropriate, and I've undone it. Please don't alter another person's comments just because you disagree with them; it is a violation of our expectations of civility. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Artix Entertainment

Hi, I'm Eruhildo, the current leader of the AE project, and I noticed you added your name to our participants list. I was just wondering if you actually plan to contribute to the articles in the scope of our project since the manner in which you added your name looked like it may have just been a joke. I just wanted to make sure since I like to keep tabs on all our members. Thanks! --Eruhildo (talk) 16:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

userbox

how about this one, bro.

This user is a fan of I'm On Base

3nih (talk)

Fair Use image in userbox

Wikipedia's policy on Images on user pages says that non-free images are not allowed. There is also an essay about the Removal of fair use images. Based on these policies, I have removed Image:PokemonDiamondBox.jpg from {{ User:I'm On Base/Pokémon }}. ~ BigrTex 01:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

userbox

Mushroom Head! This user is a fan of Mushroomhead

Mushroomhead7697 (talk) 22:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: OMG

Fortunately, them message has already been reversed. The Chronic 00:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

RfB

Just now, someone tranascluded the RfB you created a couple of days ago to WP:RFA. I've removed it. Was this what you wanted, or was this done without your knowledge? --barneca (talk) 01:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Your RfB

I strongly suggest you immediately withdraw your RfB. You are completely unqualified for this position, and your nomination reflects badly on you. It will be rejected. Please save yourself and everyone else the trouble of multiple opposes before it is closed early by someone else. Thanks, Gwernol 01:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Gwernol, User:LAX transcluded it, not I'm on Base. I'm not entirely sure I'm on Base even knew it was live, and suspect this was a test. I've removed it from WP:RFA (see above), and plan to delete it as a test page unless I'm on Base gives me a good reason not to. I'm on Base, is this OK with you? --barneca (talk) 01:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, this is certainly possible, although I'm On Base accepted his self-nomination, so deserves at least some of the "credit" for this. Gwernol 02:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I'm On Base didn't accept the nomination, even though it was a self nom. I've also asked the admin who transcluded to comment on their talk. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm... perhaps you're right. I was reading this as a signed acceptance. I guess it technically doesn't say "I accept", though I initially read it as an accepted RfB. Gwernol 02:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • I closed the RfB, as you are not an admin yet, and this is grounds to immediately remove and close. I suggest you read WP:ADMIN and WP:CRAT, as well as anything in Category:Wikipedia adminship. Please don't let this stop you from contributing to wikipedia. Best wishes. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

mushroomhead7697

he is a sockpuppet of TheGoodSide. he made it first and used his "good" account and the sockpuppet one one for evil

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Mushroomhead7697". The reason given for Mushroomhead7697's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

  • Decline reason:

For violating our Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy which prohibits the use of multiple accounts you have now been blocked from editing Wikipedia for two weeks. Should you breach the trust of the Wikipedia community once more in this manner you may face a permanent ban from the site. --  Netsnipe  ►  04:29, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Since I've now confirmed that this isn't your first time violating WP:SOCK, you can now consider yourself indefinitely banned from Wikipedia now. --  Netsnipe  ►  04:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Note: I've deleted all sub-pages save User:I'm On Base/Awards and User:I'm On Base/Guestbook (Lists to watch for possible existing socks); and the talk page archives. - jc37 05:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Looking at this and wondering if we need a checkuser. - jc37 05:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

please

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "please. i am sorry. i wanted to be a good user. and i am serious about my brothers. please unblock me"

Decline reason: "Your brothers have nothing to do with your block. This request does not convince me that you were blocked in error. — Sandstein (talk) 12:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "i am not a sock puppeteer. my brother TheGoodSide is the puppeteer. he is puppeting Mushroomhead7697."

Decline reason: "Well, then, your brother has gotten you blocked. Take it up with him. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 14:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: " see this page. my brother admits it."

Decline reason: "According to that, you are a sockpuppet of User:3nih Gwernol 21:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "i am not a puppeteer. and neither is my brother 3nih. TheGoodSide my other brother is a puppeteer for mushroomhead7697. why doesn't anyone believe me."

Decline reason: "Because from our end its impossible to prove your story. An see WP:MEATPUPPET. — MBisanz talk 00:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "see my brother 3nih's talk page. it explans everything"

Decline reason: "It explains nothing. Since you keep repeating the same reasons over and over again, I'm protecting your talk page. Email the unblock list if you still want to contest this. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 02:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.