Talk:I, the Jury
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'd like to point out that this article is mainly about the novel. <KF> 22:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Template:Spoiler
The warning below was the first thing which was posted on this talk page. I'd like to ask anyone who feels the spoiler warning should (must?? A new craze?) be removed from the article to read it and maybe get in touch with me. <KF> 22:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
DO ***NOT*** READ ON IF YOU WANT TO ENJOY THE NOVEL! DO NOT EVEN READ THE WARNING BELOW!
! ! ! WARNING ! ! ! Do not consult any secondary material on Mickey Spillane either before reading this novel! In particular, avoid T J Binyon's -- otherwise brilliant -- Murder Will Out. The Detective in Fiction (1990), where the author spoils all the fun by saying that Spillane "ends the novel with Hammer executing a naked woman, the beautiful blonde psychiatrist who has been pursuing him throughout the book and is the murderer of his crippled friend".
It doesn't work—David Gerard has just removed the spoiler warning again. For a similar case, see Talk:Tomorrow (novel). <KF> 00:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
How...how could you? It was easy...
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Jury small.JPG
Image:Jury small.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Jury small.JPG
Image:Jury small.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "... released a year earlier."??
"I, the Jury (1953) is a United Artists film based on the best-selling book written by Mickey Spillane released a year earlier."
Wasn't the novel first published in 1947, as it is claimed earlier in the same text? <KF> 16:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Not an execution
I have changed the wording of the ending because I believe it is inaccurate to call Hammer's ultimate actions an execution. An execution is the carrying out of a court's death sentence, which is not what Hammer is doing; indeed the point of the title is that he considers himself his own jury and disdains the whole idea of deferring to a court. His shooting of Charlotte is either murder (revenge for her own murder of his buddy) or self-defense (because she was trying to get hold of her own gun and shoot him). My own thought is that it is murder, because he states his intention to kill her before she tries for her gun; thus it would be Charlotte, and not Hammer, who was acting in self-defense.
Incidentally, Hammer himself in retrospect calls his act a killing rather than an execution, in Vengeance is Mine.
Pirate Dan 19:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)