User talk:Hyperion924
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] CHICOTW - AT&T Corporate Center past editor
 |
|
 |
|
In the past you have edited AT&T Corporate Center. This week it has been selected as the WikiProject Chicago Collaboration of the week. Each week a Chicago related article in need of attention is selected as the Chicago COTW. Feel free to come help us improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. Your input in future selections would also be appreciated. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
|
||
|
|
|
TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 15:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
 |
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
| I hereby award you this barnstar for your generous contributions of photographs to Chicago building articles. Chupper 02:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Cortland Street Bridge
You recently created Cortland Street Bridge. I have redirected the page and merged its text into Cortland Street Drawbridge.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] FAA addition to CHicago Spire
That's a great page you found - http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/AIR/air0601.html. However the content you added into the article is misleading. You stated buildings over 2,000 feet aren't allowed - but the reference states they are if the "sponsor" "makes a clear and compelling showing" that the structure is not "a hazard to air navigation", it can be approved. It might be cool if you could reword this and put it back in. My only concern is that the text wasn't consistent with the reference. Chupper 03:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:BCBSChicago04 05 08.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BCBSChicago04 05 08.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:TrumpTowerChicago 01 27 08.jpg
Hi Hyperion924!
We thank you for uploading Image:TrumpTowerChicago 01 27 08.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 18:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Photos
Great job with this week's photo additions. I am going to try to get Lakeshore East and all its buildings. I can't figure out how to get a good shot of the whole thing. You might want to give it a shot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] GAR debate on buildings under construction
You are an editor of Chicago Spire with at least 10 edits on the article. There is currently a debate regarding the propriety of whether buildings under construction should be eligible to be GAs at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)/1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
