Talk:Hypofluorous acid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chemicals WikiProject Hypofluorous acid is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the wikiproject's quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


[edit] Interatomic angles and lengths

The interatomic angles and lengths given in the text are different from those presented in the accompanying space-filling model graphic, with no explanation given in the text. Doonhamer 04:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I made the image. I obtained the bond lengths and angles from Greenwood, N. N.; Earnshaw, A. (1997). Chemistry of the Elements, 2nd Edition, Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 0-7506-3365-4. . Perhaps the text refers to HOF in the solid phase while the dimensions in my diagram refer to HOF in the gas phase. Bond lengths and angles are often different in different phases.
Ben 09:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Ben. I'm not very knowledgeable in the area. Maybe this can be mentioned in the article? Doonhamer 13:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for raising awareness of this contradiction.
Cheers
Ben 15:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
The angles still dont jive.--Smokefoot 15:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about removing the title of the reference - I'm not used to using <ref> tags. What do you mean by jive?
Ben 16:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
The figure and the text dont agree on the H-O-F angle. I dont have the original paper anymore, so I dont which is correct.

--Smokefoot 16:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Greenwood and Earnshaw gives the both angles, the one in the figure from spectroscopic data (gas phase) and the one in the text from x-ray diffraction (solid phase). They're both correct, aren't they?
Ben 16:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, thanks... I hadnt realized. --Smokefoot 17:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

I rewrote the paragraph discussing the solid phase bond measurements to make clear the reason for the discrepancy with the illustration. Good work everyone. Doonhamer 06:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)