Talk:Hypercolor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fashion WikiProject This article is within the scope of the Fashion WikiProject. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks!
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low-importance within fashion.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rave, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to Rave, Rave music and other various aspects of rave culture. For more information, visit our project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.

This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Global Hyper-Color. The consensus was to keep it. dbenbenn | talk 00:22, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Sweet! I want one... n:user:bawolff 06:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

01:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC) These shirts were great ... right up until the point you realised what happened if you had bad B.O. ...


Wow! Someone successfully made the most boring description of possibly the biggest and fastest fad of the 1980's. Congrats!

Gotta love the armpit rings they produce.

[edit] Current production

Is/Are there any companies still making any type of hypercolour clothing? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.35.254.252 (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC).

I miss my old Hypercolor shirt... Maybe it'll turn up in a closet somewhere someday. I'd buy one if they came back to stores for a reasonable price. Bouncey (talk) 04:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Urban Legend / Fiction

The comments about "dyes rubbing off on skin" and Generra getting "sued out of existence" are from a fictional post on Drivl.com. The author of the post pretty much acknowledges that the article used to source these "facts" is a satire. The US government does not own the patent to Hypercolor.