Talk:Hyeonmi cha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by the Soft Drinks WikiProject, a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to all non-alcoholic beverages. Please participate by editing the article, and help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Map of Korea This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea (Cuisine), a project to build and improve articles related to Korea. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please help us expand this article.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in South Korea may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Good job for adding details about how to make Hyeonmi Cha. As I haven't made one myself (I only drank it from tea packet), I just put the dictionary definition of Hyeonmi Cha, which had very rough description of how to make it. Now I can make one myself :) Stevefis 05:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Grains

If poured into a glass carefully without using a sieve, a few grains of rice will go into the cup. I am told by a Korean friend that this is normal and okay. Can this be confirmed by other Koreans? I would like to add this information to the article. Badagnani (talk) 09:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

It wouldn't be a big problem if you drink it with the grain, but in a typical tea shop or cafe that serves Hyeonmi cha, it is usually served without the grains, because some people likes to drink it without it. It goes same as bori (barley) cha, etc.Stevefis (talk) 01:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia is not a collection of trivias

"While in restaurants the tea is typically strained and served without any grains of rice, when prepared at home a few grains may be poured from the pot into the cup." This kind of sentence would apply to almost any kind of teas and besides, it is more of a common knowledge rather than a specific knowledge about Hyeonmi Cha. It's like adding a sentence "When using a common teabag, a black tea is prepared by simmering the teabag in a hot water for a for few minutes and then the teabag is discarded or used for other purposes." You put information that people would find 'informative', not a trivial common sense like this. You need to put information that is derived from authoritative sources not personal experiences or opinions Stevefis (talk) 04:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

You should take a look at Wikipedia:No original research It clearly states that Wikipedia is clearly not a place to publish your own opinions or experiences, which also includes mine. I just answered the question in the discussion, because I thought you were merely curious, but I didn't expect you to put it in the actual article.Stevefis (talk) 04:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

That is only common sense for Koreans; all other cultures would want to know this information. Badagnani (talk) 04:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

It is a common sense for all tea-consuming nations that some of the tea's or hot drink's residue can be left in it such as coffee, tea brewed without teabag, etc. Besides, did you read my second post above? Can you provide any verfiable source to back up your claim? Wikipedia is a collection of academic paper not a personal experiences or opinions Wikipedia:No original researchStevefis (talk) 04:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)