Talk:Hydroperoxyl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] What's the point of this article?
This article reads like the opening of some abstract to a thesis or a persuasive essay. Where exactly is the "here" where it is argued that HO2 is underepresented? Also, if HO2 is actually researched insufficiently, why do we have an article about it, especially one that claims to be discussing an under-researched topic in science. Frankly, this sounds like original research, which doesn't belong on Wikipedia.71.112.149.40 05:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] This is just an abstract to a research paper
The first result on google for "ho2" is the research paper this abstract is copied from. "HO2*: the forgotten radical" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12042065
It seems in appropriate to copy directly the entire abstract, but I dont want to remove the article as I have no information to replace it with and a little plagiarized info seems better than no info at all —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.227.210.64 (talk) 14:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)