User talk:HWolinsky123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, HWolinsky123! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Geniac (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

[edit] Re: Tellabs page

Thank you for your contributions, but based on the tone of your additions, they seem like copy-pasted informal PR pieces. I've removed the advert tag and added a rewrite and a nofootnotes tag instead. Are you Howard Wolinsky of the Chicago Sun-Times? --Geniac (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Tellabs page

Hi, Geniac. I am new to doing a WIki entry. I am trying to learn with this Tellabs entry. Yes, I am Howard Wolinsky. Formerly of the Sun-Times. I took a buyout in January. I am freelancing now. Just had my first article in the Chicago Tribune feature section last week and have another coming this Tuesday. I can add footnotes per your request. There is an article for every one of those cites. I thought the history of the company was pretty interesting--and not a PR piece. How can I best upgrade this entry to meet your standards?

--HWolinsky123 (talk)

They're not my standards I'm talking about; they're Wikipedia standards. Having another look at this revision that you made, I'll try to list some things I noticed, besides stuff that needs citations:

• History header. Besides a few special exceptions, articles don't start with headers. There should be an intro sentence or two like "Tellabs is a global designer and manufacturer of telecommunications equipment for service providers."
• "They wanted to build..." How do you know what somebody else wanted? If possible, quoting somebody as "We wanted to build..."
• What's "seed money"? Synonym for capital?
• "Tellabs sounded grand" to whom?
• Header: "Tellabs Expands Products, Makes Acquisitions". The last four words in this header are not proper nouns and so should not be capitalised. Same applies to later headers.
• "And the Titan 5500 did 'hunt.'". What does "hunt" mean?
• "Notebaert was dubbed by news media as the '$6 billion man.'" Which news media?
• Controversy section contains just a link to another article. A brief description of the lawsuit should be put here.
• References section. Other Wikipedia articles are not references, but they could be in a See also section. However, any article that is already wikilinked in an article doesn't need to be in a See also section.

Yes, the history of the company is pretty interesting, but some of the wording throughout threw me off, like the buzzword "solutions". --Geniac (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Looks better, but you got an error on a ref. --Geniac (talk) 05:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Agreed; looks better now, so I'll remove the rewrite tag as well shortly. I'll go through and do some formatting and see if I have any more content suggestions. --Geniac (talk) 16:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)