Talk:Hwandan Gogi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a project to build and improve articles related to Korea. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the quality scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale. | |
Contents |
[edit] HwandanGogi does not fit to GwuwonSahwa
Although the Gwuwonsahwa describe the ancient Chosun(Gojoseon) 47 Kings, the era they ruled does not fit to that of HwandanGogi. It is one of the reason why the Hwandangogi is in suspicion.
In the Gwuwonsahwa, the 47 Kings of Gojoseon ruled about 1,000 years. In Hwandangogi, the same 47 kings ruled about 2,000 years, and they are all descended the position of the king from their father, and it is very unreal.
[edit] ==============================================================
This book is a forgery with political motives.
Karolus 2006/8/22
- Have evidence?
[edit] Forgery or Retouch
Everybody must know Forgery and Retouch are different. Even authentic history books such as Samguk Sagi say wrong history because of retouch. It is problem to differentiate the retouch and forgery, and find the true history from retouched history books. For example, Samguk Sagi says that there is TWO Silla. But, none of the school historian believe there is two silla. Hwandangogi is history books that retouched portion is larger. Gyuwonsahwa has less portion of retouched history. Saying that Samguk sagi is true because samguksagi is published by government, is not the attitude of scientists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.217.151.27 (talk)
- Where in the Samguk Sagi is the story about 2 Shilla ? I can not find that. Jtm71 11:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Think of Possibility ...
According to the introductory remarks in Hwandan Gogi, 5 books were compiled by Gae Yeonsu in 1911. A document of Daejong Kyo (a korean spiritual corporation) and the JeongShinCheolHakTongPyeon which published in 1919 clarifies that GaeYeonSu, the person who compiled Hwandan Gogi found the CheonBuGyeong in 1916. Then, the Cheonbu Gyeong can not be included in Taebaek Ilsa in Hwandan Gogi in 1911, because even Gyae Yeonsu himself would not know the existence of CheonBuGyeong. Maybe the assertion that Gae YeonSu compiled HwandanGogi in 1911 and found CheonBuGyeong in 1916 is true. But, to be a real, the contents of CheonBuGyeong should be compiled from 1916 ~ 1920. If they did not know the existence of CheonBuGyeong, then, all the parts of Hwandan Gogi refering the CheonByGyeong should be considered to be changed.Jtm71 00:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I see. I did not know that 천부경 was found by 계연수. Thanks.--Hairwizard91 02:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Moved from the article area
"* The uncertainties found in Hwandan Gogi can be explained by the fact that the existing text is a restored version, not the original."
It was moved from the article for it lacks source and is not likely to be true. [1] They assert that the original version is the same as the book which is available nowadays. Jtm71 02:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
