User:Husond/recall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
My criteria for a recall are simple. If you think that I should not be an administrator of the English Wikipedia anymore, just sign below and state why do you think I should not be an admin. I will request de-adminship (and most likely launch a recall RFA) if any six users in good standing (at least 500 contributions to the English Wikipedia) sign in. However, consider talking to me first about your concerns before asking me to step down, as those very concerns may be a misunderstanding or just an isolated, unfortunate mistake I may have done. Remember, I'm always willing to discuss your complaints.
[edit] Users below think that Húsönd should be desysopped
Note: entries below that are older than 4 months will be removed, as will entries that fail to provide any reason for Húsönd's de-adminship.
- I have no confidence in Husond's honesty or judgment. He intervened in the (quite normal) discussion over whether Franjo Tudjman should be spelt as is most common in English or as is correct in Croatian. This discussion was proceeding in its normal silly fashion when Husond proceeded to revert war on a toot of his own, arguing what none of the Croatians argued, that Tudjman is not common in English, despite the evidence on the talk page and general consensus on both sides of the policy discussion. This has descended to a revert war in which he claims that almost always is subjective and frequently is not. If any other reasons are stated here, I will comment. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed, it's getting worse. This claim: "there are no sorts of sources that are more important or relevant than other sorts of sources." flatly contradicts WP:V. Admins should not be ignorant of our key policies; nor should they misrepresent them. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)