Talk:Hurricane Naomi (1968)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Hurricane Naomi (1968) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on February 1, 2008.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 27, 2008 Good article nominee Listed April 10, 2008 Peer review Reviewed May 21, 2008 Featured article candidate Not promoted Current Status: Good article

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.
	This article has been assessed by editors of the WikiProject.

[edit] Todo

Just a few quick things. I'd like if some modern sources were used, but I know that might be possible. There are a few unexplained acronyms and terms (ITCZ, GMT), that should be appropriately Wikilinked. Overall, it's good enough for B class. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Fixed the abbreviations listed above. In an old edit to the article, I wikilinked the ITCZ in the intro and had it in long form IIRC. Since then, I editted it out, explaining the lack of that wikilink. User:Hurricane Angel Saki - Welcome to my own personal NHC 08:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Good article review

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Nice job on the article, Jake52 **achem** Hurricane Angel Saki. I'm surprised there's that much data out there for a storm back in the 1968 PHS. Good luck on your next article. Naomi passes all Good Article requirements as is thus a Good Article.^Mitch32^contribs 22:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)