Talk:Hurricane Lester (1992)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Mexico Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is part of WikiProject Illinois, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.

Regarding your revert: I made positive changes to the article (removed a false sentence which the sources did not back up and rephrased a poorly-spelled, poorly-worded sentence), so there's no reason you should be undoing them. Please note that WP:OWN does technically apply to all pages on Wikipedia (despite the rather one-faced title "Ownership of articles) - this would include user sandboxes. – Chacor 15:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

On the contary, the source and AMS source clearly states that lester (or the remnants of it) merged with andrew over central united states. (you probably just glanced though the source instead of actually reading it). Storm05 16:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Todo

Content wise, it's B class, though it needs a good copyedit and rewriting in multiple places. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

The content may be B standard, but the quality of writing is poor. Start is more appropriate until a THOROUGH copyedit is done.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I gave it its needed copyedit, and thus raised it to B class. Hurricanehink (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)