Talk:Hurricane Fefa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Fefa article.

Article policies
Good article Hurricane Fefa has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Featured topic star Hurricane Fefa is part of the "Retired Pacific hurricanes" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Hurricanes
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaiʻi, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Hawaiʻi. Please participate by editing the article Hurricane Fefa, or visit the project page for more details.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a brief summary at comments to explain the ratings.)

[edit] B class

I upped it to B. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 22:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA!

As you hurricane guys/gals always do, you've created an excellent article. This one, in particular, certainly meets all of the requirements of WP:WIAGA. My only suggestions would be to explain the path shown in Image:Fefa 1991 track.png- that is, which direction was the hurricane travelling (even if this seems obvious) and what the different colors mean- and, as should always be done for every article, do another copyedit. Otherwise, the article is superb. -- Kicking222 19:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)