Talk:Hurricane Charlie (1951)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Todo
Article is almost there...a little more on impact would be nice, but mostly it just needs to be copyedited. Jdorje 05:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Good article review
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- Is it neutral?
- Is it stable?
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
Nice job, CapeVerdeWave, this article had been sitting there forever and was not getting expanded. You did a nice job. I really suggest sending this to PR then FAC. This is the definition of a great 1950s storm. Passes all criteria.Mitch32contribs 21:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)