User talk:Hunts-The-Enemy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Speedy deletion of Graveyard In Your Honor
A tag has been placed on Graveyard In Your Honor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 04:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Theodor von Luitger
A tag has been placed on Theodor von Luitger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Biomedeng (talk) 03:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Growling Bear
Growling Bear
A tag has been placed on Growling Bear, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eóin (talk) 04:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- If you didn't think it should have been deleted, raise the matter at deletion review or create a draft in one of your subpages. —BoL 00:03, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- As Blow of Light says, if you believe that the page was incorrectly deleted, the way to handle it is to request a review at WP:DRV or, if you wish, you may create a subpage in your user space, where you may take as long as you wish to craft the page, and THEN it won't get deleted. If you are having trouble getting pages deleted, please read Guide to Creating your First Article and Reasons why pages get deleted. They all have some good tips to avoid these problems in the future. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Sir William James
A tag has been placed on Sir William James, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. J.delanoygabsadds 18:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Heavenly Kingdom Of Sicily
I deleted this, as I could find no indication it's real. We already have Kingdom of Sicily which would cover this. What's the deal? Do you have sources for this? Are you just making things up? Friday (talk) 18:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Karl Hallor
The article Karl Hallor has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. There are thousands of WWII veterans. You need to explain why this one is notable per WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Karl Hallor
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Karl Hallor, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?
is he real? did he win the award? some sort of source is needed. cf: [1]
