User talk:Huadpe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Huadpe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! TomStar81 02:13, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the recommendations on my small addition to Citizens Against Government Waste. I've added a couple of supporting references. I may have made it worse in other ways: I didn't fully develop the new idea. I'm loath to make it too long.
I really think that section needs work: it isn't even self-consistent. I would support what I think you are working towards.
The connection to Abramoff on this topic is remarkable. I have not found the US Senate report discussing this. Hey, I'm a Canadian. DHR 01:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edit to free will
A couple of notes on [this edit]: first, there's no need to link to an article [[Like this|like this]]. Lower case letters always work fine, which makes it a lot easier for us to link (that's one of the reasons we don't capitalize unless necessary either). Second, when you make an edit to an article you should generally try to cite sources. In this case I thought there might be enough at the linked article, existential phenomenology, to cover it, but that article doesn't even have references, so you're out of luck there. Also, free will is a featured article, so be especially careful making edits to it (e.g. cite sources all the time, and take it up on the talk page if in doubt). Featured articles can still often be improved on, but they can also be made worse even by well intentioned edits. Due to the lack of sources I have reverted this particular edit, though I know very little about the topic (especially existential phenomenology) - we really need a team of knowledgeable people actively maintaining it. Richard001 (talk) 11:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)