Talk:HU-16 Albatross

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Military aviation task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Aircraft WikiProject

[edit] Type rating

I believe the statement that a type rating is required to act as co-pilot is incorrect. Obviously the Pilot-In-Command would require a type rating, but I believe that in the US, only Part 121 operations require that a copilot have a type rating in an aircraft that requires a type rating to act as pilot in command. I believe that is for compliance with ICAO regulations, and does not apply to operations under Part 135 or Part 91. I will change the notation in 30 days unless somebody can point out a FAR that shows that I am wrong (I might be, but I'm 95% certain). —Preceding unsigned comment added by MusketeeerMan (talk • contribs)