Talk:HQ-7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Associated task forces (general topics):
	Military technology and engineering task force
	Weaponry task force
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	Chinese military history task force

Re-wrote & re-formatted the article -- Adeptitus 23:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Added a "citation required" tag for two reasons:

This opinion does need a citation.
The existence of a long range SAM does not invalidate the need for a shorter one, especially the HQ-9, which is supposedly cursed with a ridiculously high min alt (for a modern long range SAM) of 500m, which would render it rather useless against seaskimmers, and would explain why they are still buying Russian SAMs. Kazuaki Shimazaki 00:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Agreed -- opinion line removed. -- Adeptitus 22:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Talk:HQ-7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search