User talk:Hpfan9374/2008P1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
|
---|---|
2006: October - December |
|
For the current talk page, see User talk:Hpfan9374. |
Harry and the Potters discography
In reply to your expansion of Harry and the Potters discography. Now, I am by no means an expert on discographies or experienced in any music articles but the Live Releases section seems to me just to be a list of live performances they've done at mostly a variety of libraries...? But it does say they've been recorded elsewhere. Can you please explain? •97198 talk 01:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wait, sorry, misunderstanding. I've slashed a comment from above. But still, is it just me or is this just a list of all the live performances they've done? (Even if an audio recording has been released - that's my understanding.) •97198 talk 01:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Again, I stress that I have minimal experience in music articles and particularly discographies but looking at all the other FL discographies there doesn't seem to be any other list with a similar section (leading me to think that this may not ought to be included). There are many sections listing live albums, however those seem to have been more "official" having been released on CD format and having recorded chart numbers. May consult someone with more "expertise"? At the moment I don't feel that I could support or oppose a second FLC nom as I am just not sure about the added section. •97198 talk 05:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't think you should really add a list of NN live recordings simply for the sake of padding the article so it can make FL status. -- Scorpion0422 02:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Internecine project.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Internecine project.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Discography edits
Thanks for some of your edits to a few of my discographies. I just wanted to let you that "various artists" should be un-capitalized, since it is not a proper noun (no one is called "Various Artists", that's just a phrase). No big deal, just wanted to point that out. Anyways, thanks again. Drewcifer (talk) 11:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Harry and the Potters discography
Maybe things will go OK...anyway, you might want to read User:Giano/A fool's guide to writing a featured article which is quite good and funny. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD Nominations
Regarding your recent AfD nominations (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jingle Spells: Leaky's Rocking Christmas and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocking Out Against Voldemedia), if you are the only person to significantly contribute to the article, you can delete it yourself by placing {{db-author}} on the articles. If you need any help, feel free to contact me on my talk page. Billscottbob (talk) 04:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. It appears as though the articles were successfully deleted and the AfD nominations closed. Billscottbob (talk) 02:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wzrockepclublogo2007.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wzrockepclublogo2007.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wzrockepclubmontage.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wzrockepclubmontage.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Draco and the Malfoys discography
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Draco and the Malfoys discography, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Family (EP)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Family (EP), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Party Like You're Evil! Sampler
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Party Like You're Evil! Sampler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Your comments
this comment is out of line. Both users are opposing the list based on 1a3, which states "contains a finite, complete and well-defined set of items that naturally fit together to form a significant topic of study" and they believe that it is not a significant topic of study as it is a fairly unknown band (and even a bit on the crufty side) which is a perfectly valid reason to oppose an article. Please do not ask closers to ignore comments again. -- Scorpion0422 01:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar
Hey there Alex! I'm glad you like my design. Thanks for the barnstar! Have a good day. :) —Anas talk? 20:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Elvis chart stats
Hi! There are plenty of books listing Presley's charting history in various countries, but try googling "Elvis chart statistics", several times, each time adding the name of desired country and the word "album" or "singles", and you will find at least some of the info you require. The stats for his film soundtracks might be on separate sites. I haven't found one convenient site for all this information, which is a pain - but happy hunting! Rikstar (talk) 10:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Soul Intent (album)
I have nominated Soul Intent (album), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul Intent (album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Draco and the Malfoys
Template:Draco and the Malfoys has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Guest9999 (talk) 15:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
ArticleHistory
Please see the instructions at Template:Articlehistory; I removed six talk pages from the articlehistory error category.[1] When you complete an articlehistory, you can scroll to the bottom of the talk page and see if the red error category is lit up; let me know if you need help in the future. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dracoandthemalfoys family.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dracoandthemalfoys family.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eminem fuckinbackstabber.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Eminem fuckinbackstabber.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Harry and the Potters' split 7" with the Zambonis
An editor has nominated Harry and the Potters' split 7" with the Zambonis, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry and the Potters' split 7" with the Zambonis and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Hatpzambonissplit7.jpg
Following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry and the Potters' split 7" with the Zambonis this image you uploaded became orphaned non-free content in violation of WP:NFCC criteria 7. I have tagged it as such and unless the siutuation changes or "some reason to retain it is given, the image will be deleted after Monday, 10 March 2008" in complience with WP:NFCC#Enforcement. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 01:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
203.10.121.83
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dada-classroom-film.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dada-classroom-film.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hospital-wing-film.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hospital-wing-film.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hpgof-prefectsbathroom.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hpgof-prefectsbathroom.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)