Template talk:HP Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Dumbledore.jpg

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Harry Potter, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter universe. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

NA This article has been rated as Class NA on the quality scale. NA This article has been rated as NA-Importance on the importance scale. For more information and how you can help, click Show → Merge articles that we have agreed to merge at Notability Work on pages in our improvement drive to bring them to GA or FA status Remove original research from every article that has it Check the to do list for the Harry Potter article to help get it to FA Improve plot sections in accordance with WP:WAF Perform some much-needed work on fair use images Help expand content at the Muggles' Guide Expand factual subsections of HP book pages (such as editions and translations) Help the article Horcrux Add critical reviews to all book pages edit tasks

I propose to add the "Current head" of the association in the template. Lag 21:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Since no one opposed it, I have done it and updated all the articles that were using it. Lag 13:06, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

"Current" head is in-universe -- it should be adjusted to "Heads" and be an all-inclusive list of those who've filled the role. --EEMeltonIV 17:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree. (Indeed, there are many articles about the HP universe that are written in an in-universe style.) I'll look to fixing this. How does "Leader(s)" sound? -Phi*n!x 04:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Done now. In the code of the page, it will still say "current head" (just to avoid having to fix this in every article that uses the template), but it will display as "Leader(s)." Someone with the capability of automating it could change the code within each page. -Phi*n!x 20:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Sounds like a mission for AWB and/or too much spare time. I'll try to fire up/find one or both in the next few days. --EEMeltonIV 20:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, I feel in the mood for a rote, mindless task. Plus, I'm finding that they all will need some manual attention due to the different connotation of the name. -Phi*n!x 20:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)