Talk:Howard Gardner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Assess (Education)
This is referenced or is referenced by impication on the Education page ... therefore mid importance (might be high?) Victuallers 13:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
this page needs more info on his current status & bio, considering his importance to psychology Wkilis 05:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Intelligences
Examples:
- Visual/Spatial: notices details
- Musical: creates, comprehends, and appreciates music
- Verbal/Linguistic: able to use language effectively
- Logical/Mathematical: able to reason logically
- Interpersonal: notices subutle aspects of behavior
- Intrapersonal: aware of own feelings, motives, and desires
- Bodily/Kinesthetic: able to move body skillfully
- Natualist: Recognizes patterens in nature
- Existentialist: Spiritual
[edit] Merge
I suggest Naturalist Intelligence be merged into this article, anyone object Aspensti 01:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
There is no corresponding discussion on Gardner's page concerning the other intelligences. Merging this into the page would create an imbalance of content. I suggest keeping it separate, but labelled as a stub, or creating a larger page with similar detail on all of his suggested intelligences. --Aaronp808 18:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I agree that adding Naturalist Intelligence creates an imbalance. Especially now that it has been officially added to the "list" (see Intelligence Reframed). Detail concerning the suggested intelligences would add appopriate depth. I further suggest that his work within the realms of creativity, arts, and leadership be expounded. It could also be noted the tremendous influence of Lev Vygotsky, Jerome Bruner, and Nelson Goodman on his work.74.193.1.242 21:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Matthew A. Foster
No, let it stay. I am sure this will grow as other scientists add their two cents. Dane Sorensen
No merge, it will be too confusing. futurebird 04:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- I've merged Naturalist Intelligence into Theory of multiple intelligences, where there was already a subcategory of that classification. I think that made the most sense, it certainly didn't belong here. --Jackson 15:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Changing Minds recently released?
This book was published in 2004 that isn't recent. Kendirangu 10:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for writing shit and nonsense. Hope you get a big horse dick up your as