Talk:Hotel Hangout
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Created New Page
I created a new version of the page in the "Temp" page section that has an original plot - no copyright infringement whatsover. Please make that page the new "Hotel Hangout" page. I am slowly working through every episode of The Suite Life of Zack and Cody and writing original plots where needed. I think this is my 13th. Please give me (and others) a chance to create them all. We'll get to the all and remove all copyright infringements from this series' descriptions. Thanks. MKaiserman 12:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- How was the last description a copyright violation? This is what it was: "Zack and Cody try to make friends at school. Everyone wants to hangout with them and things get out of hand when a party breaks out. Tapeworm and Max are the only ones that like them for them not because they live in The Tipton." That doesn't look like the one on tv.com to me. Please explain. - Nights Not End 01:43, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- I completely agree. Other than the first sentence, the rest of the original plot is completely different than the tv.com one. Nonetheless, the page was due for an expanded plot. I am not sure how the page gets "un"-flagged and the "new page" (which is the old page just with a new plot) gets put in. Anyone else know? MKaiserman 03:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- Would it be possible to just copy everything from the temp page and paste it into the main article? It's worth a try. - Nights Not End 03:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- I completely agree. Other than the first sentence, the rest of the original plot is completely different than the tv.com one. Nonetheless, the page was due for an expanded plot. I am not sure how the page gets "un"-flagged and the "new page" (which is the old page just with a new plot) gets put in. Anyone else know? MKaiserman 03:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Restored Page
On February 5, I wrote a new version of this page on the "temp" page that had no copyright infringement. I asked in several locales for this page to be substituted for the copyright notice violation. I was told this would happen and waited for the user]/admin? who put in the original notice to do so. Nothing has happened in the ensuing weeks. So, I have replace the copyright notice with the new version of the page. Plase note, the original article wasn't a copyright violation in the first place. But that aside, it is not approrpaite to have a copyright violation notice go up and 2 weeks later no action taken by Wikipedia admins. to restore the page. I have "been bold", as Wiki encourgaes, and done it myself. MKaiserman 14:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)