Talk:Hosiery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't see that hosiery is necessarily an undergarment. It is so only to the extent that it is not normally visible when worn. Legwear, to the extent that it is ordinarily worn in full view would not be underwear.

[edit] ==

Ugly chicks

I came here because I didn't know what the word mean't and I get here and these women made me sick. Both of them of chunky legs are are pushing 40. Did you take a picture of your mum? Thanks a lot I almost threw up :(

[edit] ==

Sexual attitude.

This whole Hosiery series is so ridiculous in it's concept. It should be re-titled woman's hosiery since it deals with the subject as if male hosiery doesn't exist. Can the author please redo his articles and either make it clear that they are written with respect to female attire or include male aspects of the subject. It would also be sensible if the obvious "American" basis of a lot of the content could be made more international in it's outlook (Catholic school girls is one example of this). rturus (talk) 17:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Androgyny?

Is that second photo simply labelled 'stockings' a man? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Casdious (talk • contribs) 17:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)