User talk:Horologium
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Talk page box taken from User:Pairadox who got it from User talk:Danelo, who got it from User talk:Adambro.
Archives |
---|
May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 |
Contents |
[edit] Ni Hao, Kai-Lan
Oh, sorry, I see what you mean. I went through that site three times looking for where the copyvio was, but you meant that the IP was adding the copyvio. My misunderstanding (again; you were the one to inform me that American English was in fact allowed back in August last year!). The copyvio notice led me to believe that the text was still there. :) Oh well, I have no objection to overturning the decision, but I thought the number of edits was a bit too low to warrant protection for now. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hi there!
Hi there! I supported you in your recent RfA, and I just wanted to ask you how you are coping with the extra buttons. How are you doing? Cheers, Razorflame 22:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I've used them only a bit, since I ended up taking three college classes less than two weeks after my RFA. I've done a little bit of everything (speedies, expired PROD, AFD and UCFD closes, page protection, and a couple of blocks. Once I finish my classes at the end of the month, I'll be doing a lot more admin drudge work, but for now, I just pop in when I can and check my watchlist and do the easy fixes. Thanks for asking. (grin) Horologium (talk) 22:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] RfA
Hey there, Horologium. Just wanted to drop you a note that I don't really think I'll be answering the remaining optional questions on my RfA - considering that the entire opposition came from my answering #4 and #5, I just don't think I want to give any more "ammunition" to the oppose. While I have remained calm and refrained from making a big deal about the opposes, it's hard to see them come - in one of those diffs, the admin who "blocked for incivility" was desysoped - read that again, desysoped - because it was a horrifically bad block. And it's being cited against me. Sigh ;-)
Anyways, I would be more than happy to answer any specific questions you personally had, either here or on my talk page. This message is not a plea for support, it is merely an explanation that your neutral !vote request probably won't be answered in the RfA. Tan | 39 17:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough. FWIW, I supported sanctions against Tango, although I didn't expect him to be de-sysopped as a result. That was done because he totally refused to acknowledge any possibility that he was out of line, and I think your response to the whole thing was not inappropriate. It's not something I would have posted myself, but of course YMMV. I may end up supporting you anyway, for a variety of reasons, including the nature of some of the unstruck opposes. Horologium (talk) 18:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Usurp on de.wikipedia
This is to confirm that I am requesting usurpation of Benutzer:Horologium on de.wikipedia. Horologium (talk) 00:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)