Talk:Horsemen of the Esophagus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
Notability: Released on April 25, as of April 27 there are 8 articles in Google News. From Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(books)#Note_on_notability_criteria
-
- Nonetheless there is no dictum against any book that is reasonably spread or otherwise well-known or remarkable. Ask yourself if several libraries or bookshops, or a no-subscription website have a copy of the book, so that other wikipedians can easily consult the book, or at least have access to on-line or press-published reviews of the book.
- Usually, books with an ISBN-number and/or availability in a couple dozen of libraries and/or a Project Gutenberg type website, and with a notability above that of an average cookbook or programmers manual would qualify.
If you want to insist the book is not notable today and send the article to AfD that is your right, but this is a topic of significant public interest (see Morgan Spurlock) and I would be very much surprised not to see this book on the NYT bestseller list in a couple of weeks. The article needs a bit of cleanup, and some expansion once a wikipedian has read it, of course. Can you wait two weeks? Thatcher131 00:29, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
