Talk:HorrorPops
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
 |
HorrorPops falls within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a project to create and improve Denmark-related Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, all interested editors are welcome! |
|
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | |
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
Horrorpops → HorrorPops – They use the mixed case name ProveIt (talk) 06:39, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Support - The cover of the album Bring it on! and all over the official website--Zilog z80 18:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
[edit] This is a good picture... if someone can upload it to this page...
http://www.melkweg.nl/mmbase/images/6683 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.105.54.43 (talk) 07:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC).
[edit] structure
Guys, this is much too informal. It sounds like a teen mag, not an encyclopedia! x.x Toyboxmonster (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. I started to clean up some of the grammar and spelling mistakes, but the number is a bit daunting. The article seems to shift tense as well as narrative perspective. This article needs some serious editing. WaywardBuddha (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm concerned that the bulk of the timeline appears to have been copied directly from http://www.democrazy.be/?page=act&id=362&dem003=6ef3f18a0f144c2b3f42750406d8441c in this edit. That would explain the non-encylopedic style. --David Edgar (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
