Talk:Horoscope
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Midheaven and imum coeli
The article says "For events occurring where the planes of the ecliptic and the horizon coincide, the limiting position for these points is located 90° from the ascendant." Strictly these planes can't coincide, but they can be parallel, and since the stars are so far away, we can treat them as if they coincided. Am I right in thinking that the only time the horizon can be parallel to the ecliptic is when the native is on the Arctic Circle or Antartic Circle? Is it worth mentioning in the article? Is there a source for this? --Gerry Ashton (talk) 20:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bullcrap
This is as bad as believing in karma or eight-armed gods. Enough said. If you need further explanation to understand the reasoning behind my statement, then you better get your head checked to see if there is a brain in there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.32.105 (talk) 18:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- This is not the place for your personal views on horoscopes. Please review Wikipedia's guidelines for civil discussion on talk pages.Elle (talk) 11:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I would disagree. It all depends on your view of things what you're saying is something like me telling you that Jesus isn't real, it all comes down to what you believe in. And I don't believe this either but, I not going to go around telling all the believers it's "Bullcrap". And you saying that, is agianst the Contatution because everyone has a right to religion and belive and you can't go around saying stuff about other peoples believes just because you don't believe it. Oh and I want you to know a 12 year old just made you look like an idiot. (oh but I believe in Jesus to get this straight) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.197.44.40 (talk) 02:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)