User talk:Honorkell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Speedy deletion of The Supreme Council of The House of Jacob
A tag has been placed on The Supreme Council of The House of Jacob requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jj137 (Talk) 20:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of House of Jacob
A tag has been placed on House of Jacob requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 20:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speculative fiction vs. Science fiction
Hubbard was a writer in the pulps, which meant he wrote everything under the sun. Speculative fiction is not too broad a term, it's too narrow, because it doesn't include the westerns and the romances he wrote as well, but it's close enough. Science fiction, on the other hand, doesn't even remotely cover the man's fiction output, so that's a no-go. He may be known primarily for sci-fi, but that was only around 20% of his actual output. --GoodDamon 19:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
