Talk:Honi Soit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good contributions from everyone, but I think we should focus more on what goes into Honi Soit than the politics around it. It's a newspaper remember. enochlau (talk) 13:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
It would be better if there was more history of the paper included. A section for history could include people who have edited the paper in past, what important issues it has covered etc.
[edit] "A Popular History Of Honi Soit"
Who vomited into the "A Popular History Of Honi Soit" section?
[edit] Merge to SRC?
Much of the info here isn't noteworthy or verifiable in a reliable (non-primary) source. Should it be merged to the USyd SRC instead? Andjam 08:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- I believe that it should remain a separate article, for the reason that it is a well-known entity that deserves its own article. If some of the information is unverifiable, it should be removed from the article, but that is no argument for not having an article in the first place. enochlau (talk) 13:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)