User talk:Homeboypla

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:ExplosionColor.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:ExplosionLogo2.jpg. The copy called Image:ExplosionLogo2.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 07:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Explosion team2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Explosion team2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Nathan-Press.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Nathan-Press.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:06-18-07e MTM5140.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:06-18-07e MTM5140.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:LauraBW.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:LauraBW.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 18:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding Nathan Mumm

I see that you are one of the primary editors of the Nathan Mumm page. I do not believe this page meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If you can, please improve this article to demonstrate its notability. If changes aren't made to the article in the next week or so, I'll probably recommend it for deletion. QuixoticKate (talk) 19:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan Mumm

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nathan Mumm, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?QuixoticKate (talk) 20:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Nathan Mumm

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nathan Mumm, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Mumm. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? QuixoticKate (talk) 13:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)