Talk:Holy Apostolic Throne of St. Thomas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
St. Thomas did not annoint any bishops during his stay in India, hence the whole concept of the holy apostolic throne of St. Thomas is false.
- Two points:
- (1) It is almost impossible to prove a negative, like "he did not anoint any bishops." A more accurate statement would be "he did not anoint any bishops that we have evidence about
- (2) The name does not necessarily refer to his line of apostolic descent, but could simply be an honorary one, as Thomas probably was one of, if not the, first bishop in that part of India. John Carter 17:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- There are no proffs existing for an Apostolic Throne of St Thomas in Kerala.
- Points:
- [1] No evidences, not even in traditions or any of the early century writings.
- [2] St Thomas Christians always recived Bishops from Eastern Syria including few nestorians.
- [3] This article has no relevance and it should be removed as its just part of the local politics of the n number of factions of St Thomas Christians.
- Kevin 17:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Throne and Churches
Does All these church leaders Claim to be on the Throne of St. Thomas? 05:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Categories: Indian Christianity work group articles | Start-Class Indian Christianity work group articles | Top-importance Indian Christianity work group articles | Start-Class Christianity articles | Mid-importance Christianity articles | Start-Class Oriental Orthodoxy articles | Unknown-importance Oriental Orthodoxy articles