Talk:Hollis Frampton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia. | ||
[edit] NPOV
Bulk of this article (aside from filmography) contains biased statements; viz. 'noted erudition,' 'most well known,' etc. which is why I added the tag. Will try to clean up in subsequent edits.
I don't think there are that many biased statements in the article. You wrote "the bulk of the article" contains them. Can you point out more? Also, how to correct the two that you have mentioned? He was noted for his erudition (I have now added some references to back that up) and "Nostalgia" is the most well-known film of that series. I am not the original author of this piece but I am going to work on it because Frampton was a great artist and deserves a well done and accurate page without any disputes. Markal 03:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Stuff like "It is an amazing 45 minutes of film" is gratuitous, not helpful description. Tell us WHY Frampton was such a great filmmaker, WHY this films are so interesting.
[edit] Refs
No refs whatsoever. 'Nuff said. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Merryjman (talk • contribs) 01:56, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
I have started adding references. Although the HF page has no references, the content appears to me to be factually accurate.Markal 14:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
The first paragraph now has references to substantiate the factual claims made therein. I have limited time to devote to cleaning up this article but I am going to do my best as I find time.Markal 03:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
The NPOV tag should be removed. This is gratuitious. steven (talk) 22:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
