From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
- bit more than a stub - a few paragraphs; needs full expansion
and separation of language/people articles --Skookum1 (10 May 06)
- Also badly in need of citations --Miskwito 03:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Language/people separated, & language now has infobox. Still stubs though. --Yksin 10:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
|
[edit] Derogatory term in bibliography
Does anyone know why this now-removed word was there to begin with? If it is part of a book title or something, it should be restored, but if not then it should be replaced with the proper names Deg Hit'an for the people and Deg Xinag for the language. -Quickmythril (talk) 12:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- That is the name of the article, so it cant be removed. Actually, you shouldnt just remove this name as you have been doing as it is very prevalent in the anthropological literature. You should, of course, note that the name is dispreferred by tribal members. – ishwar (speak) 19:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- I live in Alaska, and have been talking with different Deg Hit'an people, and the general consensus is to NOT have the word listed as an alternative name, but only that when that name is specifically searched, then they would have the used informed of the peoples' desire not to use it. It's like saying we should write (also known by the derogatory name Nigger) on the page for African American. Please do not revert my edits again without good cause. -Quickmythril (talk) 21:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)