Talk:Hole in one

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Golf Portal
The article on Hole in one is supported by the Golf WikiProject, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Golf related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep.

Contents

[edit] Requested move

Hole in one → Hole in One — some people are confused with "Hole in One" and "hole in one" -- Gh87 02:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add  * '''Support'''  or  * '''Oppose'''  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
  • Oppose - this is correctly titled but I agree the TV episode should be renamed. BlueValour 04:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments:
  • Is confusion a reason to move a correctly named article? On the surface, I'd vote Oppose. Vegaswikian 04:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment It's official: this stays as "Hole in one". The end! --Gh87 06:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] Odds

I've read the article and the references. Are the odds quoted per hole or per round? I guess per hole. - SimonLyall 10:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ball by Hole Picture

Does that picture really contribute anything to the article?--Jickyincognito 08:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)