User talk:Hogeye

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anyone interested in past messages can use the History tab above. Please don't muck up my talk page by dredging up outdated messages. Thanks. Hogeye 05:08, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sock puppeteer template

Again, you really shouldn't remove that. It really seems like bad faith on your part. Then again, I'm not very surprised. You also never answered my question: if you see Wikipedia like a game, why can't you play nicely? --AaronS 21:03, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

You can place that template next time I get banned. I see consensus as a game, like the article says. Hogeye 02:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi Hogeye .. please I noticed that your pic about Ideology map has been proposed for deletion long ago ... I think the decision has been made in last February .. am I right ? please inform me about its copy right cause I like to use it in the arabic article of Anarchism --Chaos 12:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

It's public domain. Go ahead and use it. Someone once nominated it for deletion, but apparently nothing came of it. Hogeye 16:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

Hi there! I've noticed that you've been engaging in an edit war at Anarchism (social) and have been mislabeling your reversions as "reverting vandalism", when the issue is a content dispute, not vandalism. This is to be your only warning, and you will be blocked if you continue to edit war (please see WP:3RR for Wikipedia policies in regards to edit warring). hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 20:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Three revert rule

You have been blocked for 24 hours under the three revert rule. If you wish to appeal please contact another administrator or the mailing list.Geni 20:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Agree with block for violating three revert rule. If I was doing it I would given you an extra 24 hours for edit summary stating "rv vandalism". Did you really think that four different experinced editors suddenly became vandals? When your block is up discuss your edits on the talk page until consensus or use dispute resolution. FloNight 20:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

I consider blanking by redirection to be vandalism. Hogeye 21:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

I am lending my moral support to Hogeye, who has been the only editor to take reasonable action to resolve the anarchism article debate. - MSTCrow 06:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

So, I guess edit warring is ok then? Ungovernable Force^{Got something to say?} 07:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You have been blocked for a week

Content forks are considered not ok on Wikipedia. It's very disruptive. I warned you on this point and yet you came back from your block and just got right back going on adding to your forks and accusing people who are legitimately reverting the forks as vandals when they are just following our guidelines. It's obvious at this point that you aren't going to learn. This is your final chance. If you come back after a week and go right back at this forking business, you will be blocked indefinitely. Enough is enough. --Woohookitty^(meow) 11:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

The Anarchism (disambiguation) article is not a POV fork, it disambiguates two distinct definitions of "anarchism." As an administrator, you shouldn't be taking sides on this definitional issue endemic to anarchism. Also, blanking articles by redirection is clearly a form of vandalism. How did an idiot like you ever become an administrator? Hogeye 17:05, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

See http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=WooHooKitty. Beware of upsetting the kitty, he is not a fixed puss. - MSTCrow 00:47, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

It takes a lot less than an idiot to see through your actions, Hogeye. When you've been blocked for edit warring and disruption, the solution is not to sign out and then continue your edit warring and disruption. Come on, we're not stupid. This is silly. Stop evading your block and playing these games. --AaronS 17:45, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes. And it's not as if you are on block #2 or #3 here. You literally have the longest block record I've ever seen. --Woohookitty^(meow) 03:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning

This is your final warning. If you continue to vandalize pages on Wikipedia, make inappropriate edits or personal attacks, including inappropriate or offensive edit summaries, or continue to cause problems in other ways, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely. MetsBot 03:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

--AaronS 17:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Are you an authoritarian administrator, too, now? Hogeye 17:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

No, just stating the obvious. --AaronS 17:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anarchism/antistate

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Anarchism/antistate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Anarchism/antistate. скоморохъ 19:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)