From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hoax article.
|
|
|
Article policies
|
|
This article is being improved by WikiProject Rational Skepticism. Wikiproject Rational Skepticism seeks to improve the quality of articles dealing with science, pseudosciences, pseudohistory and skepticism. Please feel free to help us improve this page.
See Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
[edit] Snake Oil?
e.g. Snake oil? Bit random, maybe? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.83.121.172 (talk) 17:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Not only that, but snake oil is not a forgery. --Ludvikus (talk) 11:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Snake Oil reply
Despite being random, snake oil isn't a forgery as far as I know. It never immitated anything. But forgery has nothing to do with the snake oil hoax. May you find a better example, I can't hehe. Vghistorian (talk) 15:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)