Talk:HMS Illustrious (87)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale
Mid rated as Mid-importance on the assessment scale
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.


Contents

[edit] British vs. US carriers

The implication that this class of carriers was comparatively poorly armored is misleading.

The armored flight deck of the British carriers was apparently a significant advance over the wooden decks used by (at least some) US carriers. To Arthur Herman in "Rule the Waves: how the British Navy Shaped the Modern World" (p.547) reports that during the Battle of Okinawa the British carriers have proven to be much more resilient to kamikaze attacks than their US counterparts. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cdamama (talkcontribs) 07:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


HMS Illustrious (R87) → HMS Illustrious 87 — The pennant number R87 was held by the W and Z class destroyer HMS Whirlwind, like contemporary British capital ships, Illustrious was not allocated a Flag Superior. She may have been allocated one post war (which I doubt), but her post-war career is a mere sideline compared to her wartime service. Emoscopes Talk 15:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.
  • Support, as nominator above. Emoscopes Talk 18:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments:


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This article has been renamed from HMS Illustrious (R87) to HMS Illustrious (87) as the result of a move request. I have assumed the omission of the brackets was an error, in line with the other articles in the same categories. --Stemonitis 07:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, well spotted, my bad. Don't know how I missed that, I'm usually so fastidious about these things. Emoscopes Talk 23:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)