User talk:Hiwhispees

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Regarding edits to Chris DeWolfe

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Hiwhispees! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \.photobucket\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 20:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)




Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Beerfest, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 19:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your movie reviews

(this post in response to your query on my talk page)

Wikipedia is not a place for posting personal opinions. It is an Encyclopedia. I suggest you take a look at these two links WP:NOT#SOAP, WP:NOT#OR. That having been said, welcome to wikipedia and I hope you decide to stay and contribute constructively to this noble project. --Valley2city₪‽ 19:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

My friend, let me try and make it clear for you. You are not allowed to post your personal opinion about anything at all into any article at all. You can discuss things in article-talk or in user-talk pages, but any personal opinion whatsoever which appears in an article will be removed. Any article. This is an encyclopedia, which presents demonstrable facts. An opinion is not a fact. Please do not do it.--Anthony.bradbury 19:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:DerHexer. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 19:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Quentin Tarantino

Please stop adding unsourced information to Quentin Tarantino article. Please read WP:CITE and WP:BIO. feydey 20:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Then please add the source for the info You are adding to Quentin Tarantino article. feydey 20:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Writing: IGN is not a proper source, please read Wikipedia:Citing sources and add proper sources or I have to remove the unsourced info. Best, feydey 20:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted your recent changes to this article. Please specify where you found the information you are adding to this article, movies.aol.com is not enough.

[edit] Little context in Penny Marko

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Penny Marko, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Penny Marko is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Penny Marko, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nottingham (film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nottingham (film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=20816. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Erick Nolasco

A tag has been placed on Erick Nolasco, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

[edit] April 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. ... discospinster talk 01:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)