Wikipedia talk:Historical archive/RulesToConsider

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seeing as how people aren't voting on them, I hardly see the point. People are placing their names on what they do and don't support. I found this incredibly useful when I was a newbie, because it gave me a lot of insight into who the other wikipedians were. Also, knowing what rules are even under consideration (or active and virulent debate) helps a newbie get insight into the workings of the wikipedia. I advise all newbies to look at it, as well as checking out homepages and other contributions of their fellow wikipedians before randomly editing all the work put into existing articles. Having this on the main site makes it much more accessible to the people who can most benefit -- putting it on meta just reinforces the very false opinion that this is some kind of arcana of a ruling cabal. HK