User talk:Historian born 1975

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] removal of referenced content on Farhad Darya

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

[edit] another warning

According to the Biographical Encyclopedia of the Modern Middle East and North Africa, he is half Tajik. Don't remove referenced information. That is considered vandalism.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

[edit] 3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

[edit] I repeat: removing sourced information is vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Farhad Darya, you will be blocked from editing. Padmanii (talk) 17:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit wars

Edit wars are discouraged. Try an article RFC if Padmanii won't discuss the issues on the appropriate talk page. By-the-by, at least one editor thought that Padmanii was a sockpuppet of the banned user Beh-nam. If Padmanii becomes abusive, try Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts as a first step rather than aping Padmanii's tactics. Civil, polite reasoned debate with rigorous citation to appropriate reliable authority is most effective. --Bejnar (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Be aware of the Wikipedia:Three revert rule official Wikipedia policy which prohibits three full or partial reversions of the same article within 24-hours. This warning is also being given to Padmanii. --Bejnar (talk) 19:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject Afghan.

I know you're passionate about the subject... But be neutral.. On the project page you are almost racist.. Using word's like 'those Shia' isn't a good way to prove your credibility, it makes you look racist, which I don't believe is your intention. RegardsMikeonatrike (talk) 21:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR block

Althought I disagree for being blocked, but nothing I can say, as for you admins have not done so much to block anti-Afghans and those who by means of their religion, and historical means makeup of almost every little thing. such as Afghanistani, and yet every Afghan topic has been harmed, and carrying no truth and if any sources are accepted they "MUST" be Iranian or anti-afghan. Anyways I would further look out not to delete sources as far i have prove of good source against it. Also I have no idea why my source taken from Toronto online library source was deleted from the Tajikistan? Historian born 1975 (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

BTW I don't know Who is this NisarKand, for whom i have never been related to and nor live anywhere close to him, so how can i be banned for being NisarKand or his "sock puppet"?