Talk:History of the Song Dynasty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	History of the Song Dynasty has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	History of the Song Dynasty is part of the "Song Dynasty" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 3, 2007 Good article nominee Listed September 24, 2007 Featured topic candidate Promoted Current Status: Good article

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

WikiProject China     (Rated GA-Class) This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add comments) 華 This article is maintained by the Chinese history workgroup. More information about this article... High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. WikiProject Middle Ages (Rated GA-Class) Middle Ages Portal History of the Song Dynasty is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles. GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Middle Ages To do: WikiProject History     (Rated GA-Class) (Rated mid-importance) This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a group devoted to the the study, and improvement of Wikipedia articles on the subject, of History. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked Neutrality: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no <!-- 6. It is written from a neutral point of view. --> |B-Class-6=yes/no

[edit] GA Review

• The article clearly passes all of the "quick-fail" criteria.
• Check the picture of Huizong.
• Beyond that, I see no other points of specific interest to be mentioned; the article is very well-referenced and comprehensive.
• For a professional review and refinement of prose, see the League of Copyeditors.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Once 6c is taken care of, I will complete the review. Cliff smith 00:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright, since the picture tag has been taken care of and all other points have been met, I have decided to pass this article. Cliff smith 01:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Awesome dude, I'm glad it was thought highly of; it's a good article (hence its status, lol).--PericlesofAthens 23:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)