Talk:History of the Green Bay Packers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject National Football League, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. See comments
This article is part of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a WikiProject dedicated to expanding the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the Project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Top This article is on a subject of Top-importance within Green Bay Packers articles.

[edit] Split

There doesn't appear to be any info on this page that is not also present in the article for Green Bay Packers or other articles, thus not worthy of its own entry. I suggest this article be absorbed into the main entry, or the duplicious info be removed from the other entry, so this article would actually be useful. ---Jackel 22:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The article was made so the history section could be reduced and the history could be expanded. It was recommended on Wikiproject NFL. Don't know if there are any editors willing to clean this up. It's on my to do list now, but don't know when I'll be able to get to it.++aviper2k7++ 22:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Since posting my original comments, I've noted that other teams have a special "history" page, so I guess my suggestion is that this page be maintained, and the Packers page be purged of info that is present here. Its pretty long. ---Jackel 04:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
I'll do that this week, it's atop my to-do list.++aviper2k7++ 05:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
I took the tag off this is standard practice, also see my comments on the ratings comment page. Quadzilla99 01:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Seems that this article is too long and too subjective.--Ankh39 17:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)