Talk:History of surface weather analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	History of surface weather analysis has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
February 26, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

	This article related to meteorology and/or specific weather events is part of WikiProject Meteorology and Weather Events, an attempt to standardize and improve all articles related to weather or meteorology. You can help! Visit the project page or discuss an article at its talk page.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance within WikiProject Meteorology.

[edit] Creation of article

This article was created at the behest of peer review for surface weather analysis. Thegreatdr 03:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The writing is very good, and is very interesting

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Good and accurite sources

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   A large amount of info for such a little-known about topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Seems good

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Good images

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This is a very good article, and meets all good article criteria. The prose is good, it is accurite and well sourced, stable, has a neutral point of view, is well illustrated by images, and is broad, but stays on-topic. I am happy to say that this article passes GA. Thank you for your work in improving this article to good article status. Juliancolton ^{The storm still blows...} 17:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC)