Talk:History of rail transport in Poland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)

Mid

This article has been rated as mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject.

This article is within the scope of the By country series task force.

[edit] Copy Edits, etc.

I did various corrections which could qualify as copy-edits and also Wikifying. Such as:

Insert "the" every so often.
Remove links from section heading and opening sentence.
Rework a sentence or two to be more readable.
Remove second and subsequent links to the same place (there were many, so I may have missed some). I don't know if this is policy, but it does get a bit distracting when every mention of "Russia", "Russian", "Prussia", etc., is linked. It seems to be that the convention is to link only the first occurrence of a word. Is that right?
Remove the phrase "due to purchase of the larger number of shares". I was at a loss as to how to phrase this properly so I just took it out - someone else may do better at it.
The last two paragraphs of the Warsaw — Vienna line section need to be reworked, but it's not just a question of grammar, there is a semantic problem, and I don't know enough of the subject to work out exactly what was meant (or maybe I'm just tired, I'll give it a try again if no one else has done anything).

I only got as far as the above section, and will give it another go later ... Peashy 12:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I attempted the cleanup of the above last two pargraphs, I think they read better now.
The sentence about the dismissal of the Catholic Poles seems out of place; it may be important, but would be better in a discussion around the management of the building rather than in the timeline.

Now completed to the end of Prussian lines.