Talk:History of hang gliding

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of hang gliding article.

Article policies
AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

I, John Bentley, originally intended the article much more complete before posting the first word. However, I probably will not have too much time in the near future to attend to it. So please go right ahead and expand/edit this article in the wikipedia spirit of boldness.

At the moment it reads more like a list than an article. I think, however, those milestones (When. What. Where. Who.) can be preserved and text expanded underneath each of these to give the article a narrative.

Contents

[edit] Wikipedia Quick Reference

[edit] Intro

The following few key parts of the Wikipedia help have been used in the creation of this article:

Note I used 2 of the 3 main ways of citing sources. Embedded HTML links & Harvard referencing

[edit] Reference Templates

I used these forms under the Reference heading. These are take from Template messages/Sources of articles John Bentley 13:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Web and News Reference

  • Title. Title of Complete Work (June 1, 2004). Retrieved on 2006-01-12.
    • The Title of the Complete Work may be a major section of a web page or it may be the name of the web page itself.
    • The publishyear can be the full date: e.g. "June 1, 2004" instead of "2004" if available.
    • The date can be in ISO 8601 format YYYY-MM-DD: eg: "2004-06-01".
  • McGee, Maggie. "Seabed 'scarred' by tsunami quake", CNN, February 10, 2005, pp. 12–27. 

[edit] Harvard Reference


[edit] Article vs Timeline

Just moved the History section I wrote for the main HG article to this article. It needs further work to blend in. Work in progress... To discuss:

1) Is it OK to have a "text" article followed by a "timeline" article? Or should they be blend into one? 2) The added text has a large amount of reference material enclosed that does not show in the Reference section because the formatting is different. I need help of an experienced editor to figure how to show these enclosed references. 3) Some photos are duplicated. 4) Content table will be re-organized as blending is performed. BatteryIncluded 14:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Topless

The current entry regarding "topless" hang gliders is incorrect. It states "This flexibility is required for the weight shift of the pilot to create small differences in the sail's billow, which in turn lets the hang glider turn to the right or to the left." In fact, "differences in billow" is unrelated to the main reason weight shifting can be used to enter a turn. Weight shifting works perfectly well in a completely rigid machine (or any machine) by moving the center of gravity (left or right in this context). The center of lift remains in the same place resulting in a TORQUE about the X-axis (front-to-back axis). This ROLLING MOMENT quickly results in a constant ROLL RATE due to an opposing rolling moment which is proportional to roll rate (called roll damping). So a left or right shift in weight results in a proportional roll rate in ANY flying machine. To correct, suggest deleting "This flexibility is required for the weight shift of the pilot to create small differences in the sail's billow, which in turn lets the hang glider turn to the right or to the left.".

24.41.15.147

24.41.15.147 Really good to have your contribution.

  1. Any discussions ABOUT the article, by Wiki convention, are placed here, not in the article itself.
  2. I haven't reflected too much on these words under the "Topless" section. I just took 'em from an old version of the hang gliding article. Further I do not have specialist knowledge here.
  3. In this case you would have been welcome just to make the edit as you saw fit. We all equally "own" in the right to how the article is.
  4. I've made your suggested deletions to the article. I've gone a bit further, the discussion about wing flexibility doesn't belong here I think. If it is to be anywhere it should be in the main hang gliding article.
  5. If, theoretically, we where to change the sentence,"This flexibility is required ... ", then I would suggest: "This flexibility accentuates the effect of the shifting weight of the pilot to create small differences in the sail's billow, which in turn assists the hang glider turn to the right or to the left."? After all the "flex" in the wing is there for a purpose.

John Bentley 12:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] WP:Reliable sources and WP:Verifiability

Please note that all content on Wikipedia must be verifiable via reliable sources. Forums (such as Yahoo! groups) are not considered to be reliable sources in the vast majority of cases. Please do not remove properly sourced content unless there is an issue with undue weight. Also, please use edit summaries, be civil and avoid personal attacks. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jan Wnęk

As a person of polish descent, I'm all in favor of attributing the invention of control of wing trailing edges to Jan Wnęk, but I think we will need very strong documentation to support this. The reason I say this, is that the critital invention of the Wright brothers was the invention of controllable trailing wing edges. See Wright_brothers#The_patent and us|821,393. This patent was litigated, which means that the alleged infringer used every means at his disposal for find a record in any language in any country that taught or suggested the prior control of trailing wing edges. If they could have found it, they would have been able to overturn the patent. They didn't. The patent was upheld. I respectfully suggest, therefore, that we leave the description out of this article (including, alas, the picture) pending identification of an authoritative source.--Nowa 12:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

  • I have written to several administrators of the Karkow Museum asking for copies -or at least transcripts- of the relevant church records and of a copy of the old calendar made in honor of Jan Wnek's flights. I obtained no answer at all from any museum administrator. It is questionable when a museum does not display critical documents claiming for a specific invention, and very questionable when they refuse to provide information to formal request from a serious researcher. I agree with you.BatteryIncluded 14:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Thanks for your follow up.--Nowa 12:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Conduit Condor

George Uveges, photographer, took an excellent photograph of Richard Miller's Conduit Condor flying wing. The Conduit Condor is to be studied for its non-Rogallo-ness. The way that it is now grouped in a series in a sentence misleads the flying-wingness of the device. Photo rights of use were given to Joe Faust (me). I am still green on how to get a photo stuck in wikis. I think I filed a copy in one of the two groups: HangGliderHistory or HangGlidingMuseum; I will look. Joefaust 23:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Hello Joe, please contact me and I'll detail you the process to load an image at Wiki Commons and link it to the article. BatteryIncluded 00:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Long commenting removed and placed here.

The long comments in the article section more properly belong on this discussion page; they are here for editors to work as they wish:

--JD's adaptation and innovations to the already existing flex-wing are not a novel 'invention' but an evolution of the flex-wing.--

--"A" because other hang glider revolutions were underway evidenced by the discussions and experiments in Soaring Society of America, for one, where postwar energies were allowing time for getting back to play basics on the gliding hills. One of the other revolutions had zero to do with the Rogallo wing, but with fixed winged hang gliders. Another revolution of hang gliders was sparked earlier with the inventions of Domina Jalbert with the fully flexible hang glider types. These other revolutions should not be overlooked. -- --Unrelated existing elements put together for a new purpose means a new invention. However, related elements were already put together for exactly hang gliding; Palmer had the wing and triangle control frame; George A. Spratt already had the elements for any hang glider; Paresev already had the very developed wing and the pendulumed mass-shifting of the pilot along with the reduced TCF-to-stick control for hung-pilot flying in kiting over land or water into free-flying from release from tow vehicle. --

[ ] ""effective innovationsnNEEDS PROOF overNEEDS PROOF existing hang gliders were enhanced controlNEEDS PROOF VERIFICATION""

DISCUSSION, if needed, can be done here on points. There is a WEIGHT challenge on the Dickenson situation. Claiming innovation when prior art was extant and known to engineers is challenging. Repetition of overclaim has brought a tendency to overweigh the Dickenson situation. THAT Spratt already gave single-point hanging behind triangle control frame weight-shift control of aircraft and hang gliders, and THAT Paresev 1B already gave topless efficient Rogallo wing that fully covered whatever JD did with the wing, and THAT the Paresev 1B wing was fully collapsible and portable, then such items cannot be mechanical innovations by Dickenson and should not be so claimed. Someone keeps inserting overclaim for Dickenson.. The constant rework and result relative weights of facts is a lot of work by editors. The same overclaims are in an article on the Internet that is by the same writer who has been inserting similar overclaims in this article and other articles. Even Spratt's contribution had priors to it! The Horten hang gliders foot-launched had fine control. The Paresev had fine control. Palmer's HGs were lightweight. Joefaust (talk) 01:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Horten foot-launch gliders of the 1950s

Some work is needed to bring in the relative importance of the Horten foot-launch hang glider of the 1950s. The timeline needs Horten inputs.

Joefaust (talk) 01:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Joe, could you contact Bill Bennett and ask him if his flying the Horton wing had an influence in his producing flexwings? I cannot think of any other correlation, other than the Stork gliders of Wasserkupee. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

Some pre-review comments, before the main show...

There isn't a WikiProject of some sort that can help with the development of the article?

Also, a quick glance reveals a lot of errors with periods and commas. If you want to try to get to them before I do, go for it. —Rob (talk) 21:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    See below
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Wnek paragraph isn't cited. A style of references should be established and applied on references in the article, for example, using {{cite web}}. Why are refs 34/35 in the middle of a sentence, not at the end?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Out of curiosity, what about the "parallel developments" doesn't belong in the rest of the article?
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    "These flights were short and often ended in a less than elegant arrival but it was flying nonetheless." Not only a run-on sentence, but it probably needs to be rewritten to be more encyclopedic. "It was on October 4, 1957 when the Russian satellite Sputnik shocked the United States and the space race caught the imagination of its government, causing major increases in U.S. government spending on scientific research, education and on the immediate creation of NASA." -- this sentence needs to be toned down a little bit.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I reviewed all of the images to see if they were valid. They are, but there's way, way, way, way too many images (I don't advocate a "wall of images".) Pick one relevant image per section (unless there are particularly notable historical images) and use it.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

[edit] Section 1

  • 'Thus, in the 1920s and 1930s, while aviators and aircraft makers in the rest of the world were working to improve the performance of powered aircraft, the Germans were designing, developing and flying ever more efficient gliders and discovering ways of using the natural forces in the atmosphere to make them fly farther and faster, undergoing a "renaissance" of gliding aviation thus soaring became an organized sport at Wasserkuppe, Germany.' -- this is one sentence, and it shouldn't be.
  • "At the beginning of the 21st century, the sport remains popular and experimental hang glider research and development continues." In the lead, this sentence seems to be just thrown out there without very many details. It probably should be deleted.
  • "Wasserkuppe" the section header shouldn't be linked, per the MOS.
  • Actually, there are a few run-on sentences in the text.
  • Use {{convert}} for uncoverted units (meters).
  • Wiki Gary, Indiana, U.S.A.
  • Wiki and non-breaking space dates per WP:MOS (April 112008)
  • Rogallo wing is wikilinked at least 3 6 8 times. Should be wikified the first time, and only the first time.
  • Small letters after semi-colons
  • Also, unlink standalone years per MOS:UNLINKYEARS
  • "By 1961 NASA had already made test flights of an experimental STOL 'aerial utility aircraft' called Ryan XV-8 (the Flying Jeep or Fleep) and by March 1962, of a weight-shift glider called Paresev in which NASA engineers, under direction of Charles Richard, integrated a single hang point subassembly for weight-shift control; the 1B wing was topless (no kingpost), had scalloped sail of Dacron, and had battens for anti-luffing." -- also a very long run-on sentence. I won't put down any more, but in general sentences should be shorter than they have been.
  • "He used aluminum tubing and no wires for construction as he did fear kinking during assembly." -- try "...construction, fearing kinking during assembly".
  • "Limited on budget" should be "Limited in budget"
  • Text in the article should not be bolded per WP:LEAD
  • "(Spratt so hung pilot in 1929)" Parenthetical, but a fragment, and I'm not sure what it means.
  • Don't start sentences with "but".
  • "(designer: Felix Ruehle)" should be integrated into the preceding sentence. Try "The Exxtacy, designed by Felix Ruehle..."
  • "First flights from Mt. Kilimanjaro in the 1970s and Caril Ridley’s historic flights in India met with headlines and that age-old dream of human flight captured public imagination." -- needs to be toned down a little
  • The last paragraph in "Popularity" is one sentence.

Overall, the article could use a thorough copyedit. One is available at Wikipedia:WikiProject_League_of_Copyeditors, but I've given you some ideas.

[edit] Conclusion

The article contains a lot of very useful information. It needs to be tied together under the rules of the encyclopedia's manual of style, and copyedited by an editor stronger in English than me. Good luck and good job so far! —Rob (talk) 03:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the valuable assesment and feedback. I know it took long time and dedication. Review and changes will beguin immediately according to required style, but it will take time. At a later date, another application for "Good Article" will be submitted. BatteryIncluded (talk) 18:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Small note - I just looked up MOS:LINK, and as it turns out, duplicates of some links are acceptable, in general, once per subsection. However, I still would exercise restraint in wikilinking. —Rob (talk) 23:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)