From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
|
| Food and drink task list: |
|
|
|
Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
- Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Food, Bread, Beef, Curry, Drink, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yoghurt, Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom)
- Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: , Italian cuisine, Cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies, Coffee, Milk, Pasta, French cuisine, Chocolate
- Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Burger King
- Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
- Get rid of Trivia sections in articles you are working on.
- Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner to food and drink related articles to help bring them to members attention. It could encourage new members to the project too.
- Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of food
- Review articles currently up for GA status: Burger King legal issues, Chocolate
- Review articles currently up for FA status: Butter
|
|
|
[edit] Medicinal usage
This article fails on just about every level, not to mention ignoring two of the most important parts of the history of chocolate: its controversial origins in the Olmec language and its medicinal use as outlined in the Aztec codices. —Viriditas | Talk 04:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not in agreement that those are the most important things to include in this article about the history of chocolate, but if you've got the time, why not add what you know to the article instead of complaining about what you see as missing? As for the olmec, since Cacao usage spread before the olmec, and apparently from south to north, I'm not sure the cacao linguistic data is all that interesting. The article doesn't even begin to cover the interesting parts of precolumbian chocolate usage. Where's the cacao beverage that intoxicates? Where is cacao in ritual? and so forth. Rsheptak 23:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
